5. Registry-registrar separation [GAC Scorecard]

Scorecard:
Main page | Full scorecard | By rating | By subject -- see bottom of page.

Item Rating GAC advice Board notes
5 2

Amend the proposed new registry agreement to restrict cross-ownership between registries and registrars, in those cases where it can be determined that the registry does have, or is likely to obtain, market power.

ICANN sought to implement a marketplace model that would enhance competition, opportunities for innovation and increase choice for consumers while preventing abuses in cases where the registry could wield market power.

While lifting restrictions on cross-ownership, ICANN reserves the right to refer issues to appropriate competition authorities if there are apparent abuses of market power.

As previously resolved by the Board, registry agreements will include requirements and restrictions on any inappropriate or abusive conduct arising out of registry-registrar cross ownership, including without limitations provisions protecting against misuse of data or violations of a registry code of conduct.

Broken down by subject:
1. The objection procedures including the requirements for governments to pay fees | 2. Procedures for the review of sensitive strings | 3. Root Zone Scaling | 4. Market and Economic Impacts | 5. Registry – Registrar Separation | 6. Protection of Rights Owners and consumer protection issue | 7. Post-Delegation Disputes | 8. Use of geographic names | 9. Legal Recourse for Applications | 10. Providing opportunities for all stakeholders including those from developing countries | 11. Law enforcement due diligence recommendations | 12. The need for an early warning to applicants whether a proposed string would be considered controversial or to raise sensitivities (including geographical names)